Final Up to date: July 11, 2022, 13:25 IST
The warning was made in an article within the TMC's mouthpiece Jago Bangla' (Get up, Bengal) (File photograph: PTI)
The attacker misplaced his job within the Japanese Maritime Self-Defence Drive after three years of service and he was not getting any pension, it claimed. Agniveers too wouldn't get any pension after their four-year service interval is over, it added.
Launching a recent assault on the Bharatiya Janata Celebration, the Trinamool Congress has cautioned the Central authorities in opposition to the Agnipath scheme, pointing to the truth that Japan’s former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was assassinated by a short-service ex-serviceman.
The occasion claimed that the killing underlined the doable pitfalls of the controversial defence recruitment programme.
The state BJP, nonetheless, rejected the apprehension saying no Indian ex-servicemen had ever been concerned in any such incident. “The loss of life of Abe by the hands of an ex-serviceman has solely validated the fears of the individuals over the Agnipath scheme,” the TMC’s mouthpiece Jago Bangla’ (Get up, Bengal) stated in an article on Saturday.
The attacker misplaced his job within the Japanese Maritime Self-Defence Drive after three years of service and he was not getting any pension, it claimed. Agniveers too wouldn't get any pension after their four-year service interval is over, the article identified.
“The BJP is enjoying with fireplace within the title of Agnipath scheme. We have now seen what has occurred in Japan. An ex-serviceman killed the previous Prime Minister,” TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh stated on Sunday. The BJP stated that such apprehensions are baseless.
“We have now by no means heard of any such incident through which an ex-serviceman of our nation is concerned. The TMC is simply attempting to politicise the matter,” state BJP spokesperson Samik Samik Bhattacharya stated.
(With PTI inputs)
Learn all of the Newest Information, Breaking Information, watch Prime Movies and Stay TV right here.
[ad_2]
0 comments