Actor Jacqueline Fernandez has been issued summons by Delhi’s Patiala Home Courtroom and directed to look in court docket in reference to a ₹200-crore extortion case. The case is linked to conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The Enforcement Directorate has additionally named Jacqueline as an accused in it. The actor has been requested to look in court docket on September 26. Additionally learn: Jacqueline Fernandez tells ED her FDs are from ‘personal respectable earnings’
As per information company ANI, on Wednesday morning, the “Patiala Home court docket took cognizance of the supplementary chargesheet filed within the case not too long ago”, directing Jacqueline to look earlier than it on September 26. The case entails alleged extortion and cash laundering by conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. On August 17, the Enforcement Directorate had named Jacqueline as an accused in it. The actor was rumoured to be in a relationship with the conman after footage of the 2 surfaced on-line.
Earlier, the ED had alleged that Chandrashekhar used cash to buy presents for Jacqueline, which he had extorted by dishonest high-profile individuals together with former Fortis Healthcare promoter Shivinder Mohan Singh's spouse Aditi Singh. Jacqueline has been questioned a number of instances by the company on this case, the final being in June. The ED in April provisionally hooked up ₹7.27 crore funds of the actor beneath the PMLA aside from ₹15 lakh money because the company referred to as these funds as "proceeds of crime".
In her response to the court docket by means of her authorized staff, the actor maintained that her fastened deposits are from her personal cash and never from what was gifted to her by Sukesh. “The actor claimed that deposits are from the actor's personal respectable sources of earnings and far earlier than in time from even realizing that the principle accused Chandrashekhar even existed on this world,” the company instructed media.
Earlier this month, Jacqueline’s lawyer Prashant Patil stated she was a sufferer within the case and shoud not be handled as an accused. ““You must perceive the humanitarian facet of this. When any individual is harmless, and if she is charged with a pretend offence, it positively is painful and never truthful. With out listening to Jacqueline’s facet of story, it’s not truthful to prosecute her with such unfaithful allegations,” he instructed ETimes.
Although Jacqueline did share a cryptic social media submit after being named an accused within the case, she has not commented on the matter in public but. Her social media submit from August 17 was addressed to ‘expensive me’, and skim ‘it’ll all be okay’.
Trending Subjects to Observe
[ad_2]
0 comments