Congress on Dhankhar's Kesavananda Bharati Case Verdict Remarks
[ad_1]
Final Up to date: January 12, 2023, 16:36 IST
In my 18 years as a MP, I've by no means heard anybody criticise the 1973 Kesavananda Bharati judgment of Supreme Courtroom, Congress basic secretary in-charge Jairam Ramesh stated in a tweet (Reuters File)
Earlier, senior Congress chief P Chidambaram stated Dhankhar is "fallacious" in stating that Parliament is supreme and his views ought to warn each Structure-loving citizen to be alert to the hazards forward
The Congress on Thursday described Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar’s remarks questioning the landmark 1973 Kesavananda Bharati case verdict as an “extraordinary assault on the judiciary", and stated that a “no-holds-barred assault" on one constitutional establishment by one other was fairly unprecedented.
Vice President Dhankhar had on Wednesday criticised the scrapping of the NJAC Act in 2015 and in addition questioned the Kesavananda Bharati case verdict, saying it set a fallacious precedent and that he disagrees with the Supreme Courtroom ruling that Parliament can amend the Structure however not its fundamental construction.
“In my 18 years as a MP, I’ve by no means heard anybody criticise the 1973 Kesavananda Bharati judgment of Supreme Courtroom," Congress basic secretary in-charge Jairam Ramesh stated in a tweet.
“In actual fact, authorized luminaries of BJP like Arun Jaitley hailed it as a milestone. Now, Chairman of Rajya Sabha says it was fallacious. Extraordinary assault on the judiciary!" he stated.
It additionally bears point out that a “no-holds-barred assault" on one Constitutional establishment by one other is sort of unprecedented, Ramesh stated in one other tweet.
“Having completely different views is one factor, however the Vice President has taken the confrontation with the Supreme Courtroom to an altogether completely different degree!" he stated.
Earlier, senior Congress chief P Chidambaram stated Dhankhar is “fallacious" in stating that Parliament is supreme and his views ought to warn each Structure-loving citizen to be alert to the hazards forward.
Reacting to Dhankhar’s remarks, Chidambaram, a lawyer, stated on Twitter, “The Hon’ble Chairman of the Rajya Sabha is fallacious when he says that Parliament is supreme. It's the Structure that's supreme." The “fundamental construction" doctrine was developed with the intention to forestall a majoritarian-driven assault on the foundational ideas of the Structure, the previous Union minister stated.
“Suppose Parliament, by a majority, voted to transform the parliamentary system right into a Presidential system. Or repeal the State Record in Schedule VII and take away the unique legislative powers of the States. Would such amendments be legitimate?" Chidambaram stated in a collection of tweets.
After the NJAC Act was struck down, nothing prevented the federal government from introducing a brand new Invoice, the senior Congress chief stated.
“The hanging down of 1 Act doesn't imply that the ‘fundamental construction’ doctrine is fallacious," he added.
“In actual fact, the Hon’ble Chairman’s views ought to warn each Structure-loving citizen to be alert to the hazards forward," Chidambaram stated.
Dhankhar had on Wednesday stated “one-upmanship and public posturing" from judicial platforms will not be good and these establishments should know conduct themselves.
Dhankhar’s digital censure of the judiciary had come following the apex courtroom’s remarks on the problem of the collegium system.
Addressing the 83rd All India Presiding Officers Convention in Jaipur Wednesday, the RS Chairman, who has criticised in and out of doors the Home the hanging down of the Nationwide Judicial Appointments Fee (NJAC) Act by the apex courtroom, stated that it was “a state of affairs maybe unparalleled within the democratic historical past of the world." “The manager is ordained to be in compliance with the constitutional prescription emanating from Parliament. It was obligated to stick to the NJAC. Judicial verdict can not run it down," he had stated.
His assertion got here within the backdrop of a raging debate on the problem of appointment to the upper judiciary with the federal government questioning the present Collegium system and the Supreme Courtroom defending it.
Learn all of the Newest Politics Information right here
(This story has not been edited by workers and is printed from a syndicated information company feed)[ad_2]
0 comments