Former English soccer star Gary Lineker revealed on Tuesday his son George was subjected to abuse and acquired ‘dying menace’ on Twitter for taking his aspect within the BBC controversy. Lineker, who's now a sports activities presenter with the BBC, took to Twitter to share a screenshot of the ‘menace,’ and requested the microblogging web site's proprietor, Elon Musk, if giving threats on the platform was acceptable.
“Is that this acceptable @Twitter @elonmusk? And I do not imply the grammar,” the previous footballer, 62, mentioned in his tweet.
The screenshot was initially shared by George Lineker, who mentioned in a earlier tweet, “Social media is mad is not it. Over the previous couple of days, on insta – by no means had so many good messages. On Twitter – by no means had a lot abuse. It is not even something to do with me.”
Twitter consumer Alex – who has since deactivated the account (@Aljedd6614) which was opened in December final 12 months and had only one follower – known as George and Gary Lineker a ‘mug’ and ‘s*******e of a dad,’ respectively, and mentioned that the previous ‘must be burned on the stake.’
Whereas Musk is but to answer the retired England nice's submit, customers in its feedback part have been outraged on the abuse.
What's the BBC controversy?
Gary Lineker, who presents the Match Of The Day (MOTD) – an English Premier League (EPL) highlights present – for the British Broadcasting Company, was suspended by the nationwide broadcaster for criticising the British authorities's new asylum coverage. The suspension, nevertheless, triggered large outrage, with parliamentarians, media personalities, sports activities pundits and footballers popping out in his assist.
Additionally Learn | Fascinating that BBC suspended star anchor...: Anurag Thakur's jibe on documentary row
Additionally, a number of BBC anchors, in solidarity with Lineker, refused to host their respective exhibits. Ultimately, his suspension was reversed, with BBC boss Tim Davie apolgising for the ‘troublesome interval for employees, contributors, presenters and, most significantly, our audiences.’
[ad_2]
0 comments