Ravichandran Ashwin celebrates with Virat Kohli© Twitter
The primary day of the primary Take a look at between India and West Indies belonged to spin wizard Ravichandran Ashwin. He had the West Indies batters on the run as he broke their resistance with some terrific bowling. He additionally achieved many feats on the day. By the second session on Day 1, Ashwin grabbed 4/49 and have become the third Indian bowler to achieve 700 wickets as hosts West Indies had been 137 for eight.
Ashwin acquired to the milestone when dismissed Alzarri Joseph (4) for his third wicket. He's the third Indian after Anil Kumble (956) and Harbhajan Singh (711) to achieve the coveted milestone.
Later, he denied Alick Athanaze a fifty on debut, dismissing him three runs shy of the milestone. Ashwin achieved a uncommon distinction of getting the wickets of each father and son in his illustrious Take a look at profession when he dismissed Tagenarine Chanderpaul on the opening day of the primary Take a look at towards the West Indies. Ashwin, who had made his Take a look at debut in 2011 in New Delhi, had dismissed Tagenarine's father Shivnarine Chanderpaul throughout his maiden look within the longest format.
Ashwin had trapped Chanderpaul senior plumb in-front within the second innings of that Take a look at match which occurred 12 years again.
Ashwin, who had 474 Take a look at wickets earlier than this match, bowled younger Tagenarine with a magnificence and have become solely fifth bowler in world cricket to dismiss each father and son throughout his profession.
Funnily, it's the Chanderpauls, who characteristic thrice within the checklist of the daddy and son duo dismissed by identical bowler.
Australian quick bowler Mitchell Starc and South Africa's off-spinner Simon Harmer are the opposite two bowlers who had dismissed Shivnarine and Tagenarine.
Could also be it's got to do with Chanderpaul senior's longevity as he retired as late as 2015, whereas his son made his debut in Exams final 12 months.
With PTI inputs
Matters talked about on this article
[ad_2]
0 comments